Silent House (2012) Movie Review 2 1129

Silent House movie review

Originally a Spanish-language film that’s less than a couple of years old (the gap between original and remake is getting ever shorter), this English language version adds rising star Elizabeth Olsen (Martha Marcy May Marlene) and like the original presents “real fear in real time,” a supposedly single-take horror film that attempts to make the scares as immediate and believable as possible.

However, while an admirable experiment – or should I say re-experiment? – Silent House only offers a handful of effective scares (which, I suppose, is more than can be said for many-a-modern horror) while the scales tip far too much into drawn out territory.

Olsen plays Sarah, a young woman who visits her old family lake house with her dad during the stage of it being renovated. When she hears a strange noise upstairs she sends her father up to check on it and before long things start to turn bad when she realizes there may be someone in the house who isn’t supposed to be there.

The main issue with Silent House is there’s just not enough scares or variety thereof. Chris Kentis and Laura Lau’s film gets by on ominous and atmospheric tension for so long but after a while it gets rather tedious. Apart from a tense highlight sequence involving a dark room and the flashing light of a Polaroid camera, scares mostly consist of the jump scare variety as we follow Olsen slowly making her way through the huge house and jumping at every loud bang, squeaky floorboard and mysterious footstep she hears. Who is it in the house and why are they there? After a while it gets annoying the secret is being held back for so long.

What’s most disappointing about the film, however, is the ending. It’s one of the most confusing, under-developed and out-of-nowhere denouements to hit the big screen in some time. You can see what they were trying to do but it’s a case of fumbling around in the dark, pardon the pun, for a conclusion to the slasher-meets-haunted house movie antics that have come before and failing to come up with something satisfying.

Silent House at least has the gimmick – and it is a gimmick – of taking place as one continuous shot (even though it’s clearly just been edited together to appear as such) and in real-time, so it’s not just another home invasion horror. And at 85 minutes it’s a brisk watch. But the potential of the interesting concept is much greater than the execution. Olsen is, unsurprisingly, great but she is a bright spot in an otherwise largely disappointing horror experience.

[youtube id=”a7mL2kuXRIM” width=”600″ height=”350″]

Silent House is out in the UK on May 4th.

Previous ArticleNext Article
I'm a freelance film reviewer and blogger with over 10 years of experience writing for various different reputable online and print publications. In addition to my running, editing and writing for Thoughts On Film, I am also the film critic for The National, the newspaper that supports an independent Scotland, covering the weekly film releases, film festivals and film-related features. I have a passion for all types of cinema, and have a particular love for foreign language film, especially South Korean and Japanese cinema. Favourite films include The Big Lebowski, Pulp Fiction and 2001: A Space Odyssey.

2 Comments

  1. I agree that this wasn’t not a very well put together effort at all and yes the time between original and remake is getting shorter and shorter. I found myself more focused on looking for cuts, which was the only reason I really had any desire to see the film in the first place was because of the filmed in one cut gimmick, rather than actually watching the film. But I was still able to notice that the film was not very good, had absolutely no scares, and although at first glance may appear that it was not all filmed in one cut you can tell that it was done in the editing room. Great review though as always!

  2. It is quite distracting isn’t it, checking to see if it is still one shot? Did you notice the blood on her top changing positions throughout? 😛 Did you see the original? Curious if you thought it was any better (I did, though only slightly).

    Thanks a lot!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Movie Review: Aquaman 0 1880

The rocky road of DCEU films has traversed highs and lows, from the zeitgeist-capturing Wonder Woman to the absolute mess of Justice League. It’s a Marvel-rivalling gambit that, at its worst, is morosely serious in how it goes about presenting its outlandish superhero world without the depth to back it up.

The latest instalment seems to recognise and avoid that danger by being utterly, eternally ludicrous and over-the-top. But most importantly, where it counts anyway, it’s crucially self-aware of that fact and has a fun time plunging us into the depths and carrying us to great heights of entertainingly ridiculous spectacle.

We first met Arthur Curry AKA the Aquaman (Jason Momoa) teaming up with the Justice League. But how did he come to be imbued with the powers of the ocean? The film sets up his origin story quite well as we discover in the film’s opening minutes that his mother was Atlanna (Nicole Kidman), Queen of the ancient underwater Kingdom of Atlantis, who washed up on the “surface world” and met and fell in love with lighthouse keeper Thomas (Temeura Morrison).

Together they had a child that, to her mind, bridges the divide between the underwater and surface worlds, proving they can be one. However, it’s a view not greatly shared by many of her own people; when she wilfully returns to Atlantis for the sake of her son’s survival, they carry out a swift sentence of justice that would affect her husband and son’s destiny forever.

In the present day, Aquaman is approached by Mera (Amber Heard), a warrior princess of Nereus (Dolph Lundgren), who tries to convince him that he must claim his rightful place as King of Atlantis. This is in order to thwart his ruthless and cunning half-brother Orm (Patrick Wilson) from seizing power as Ocean Master that would lead to a full-scale attack on the surface world, someone who considers Aquaman to be a “half-breed” not worthy of the throne.

Credit must go to director James Wan (a filmmaker who has gone from horror franchises like Saw, Insidious and The Conjuring to blockbusters like Fast & Furious 7) for really going for it by delivering an eye-popping, bonkers visual style that seems to make every effort to be the opposite of drab.

It’s fuelled by a marriage between the comic book page and Greek mythology; sometimes that gets the better of it in the shape of characters going on extended monologues that explain legends in the finest detail, though at others that feeds into the idea of stories retold through the ages.

The film is a treat to behold whenever it dives into the ocean as Wan embraces the absurdity at every turn (look out for the giant neon-lit octopus playing the drums), wearing the inherent goofiness as a badge of honour rather than anything to shy away from. And,perhaps most importantly, the cast seems completely on-board for having as much fun with those OTT concepts as they want the audience to have.

Momoa brings alight-hearted charisma, which carries the film whenever it leans too heavy into one-liner humour that doesn’t always land as hoped, while bringing a welcome sense of bruising physicality to the action scenes that are otherwise so reliant on CGI.

An impressive cast of more seasoned actors all lend as much weight to it as possible, from Kidman’s caring, strong-willed portrayal of Aquaman’s mother to Willem Dafoe as his Atlantean trainer Vulko and particularly Wilson, who lends formidable threat to the potentially bland villain Orm.

For a film that had the potential to get so tangled up in both its place within an overall comic book movie universe and the mythology that sets the foundation of its tale, it’s surprisingly streamlined and enjoyably accessible. It’s a refreshingly carefree,unchallenging romp that invites you to let the tidal wave of rambunctious comic book movie sensibilities wash over you.

6.5 out of 10

Movie Review: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse 0 1752

After so many sequels and reboots of the Spider-Man character on the big-screen, from Sam Raimi’s trilogy to the character being integrated into the Marvel Cinematic Universe, it’s hard to see what else they can give us that’s going to surprise. But along comes an animated Spider-Man to do just that.

Miles Morales (Shameik Moore) is a normal teenager living in New York with his parents; loving but fairly easy-going mother Rio (Luna Lauren) and loving but tough police officer father Jefferson (Brian Tyree Henry) – the film has a surprising emotional through-line in how it depicts the father-son relationship.

One day while doing some secretive spray painting with his chummy uncle Aaron (Mahershala Ali), he is bitten by a mysterious spider that gives him special powers from web slinging to a tingling Spidey Sense.

This leads him to eventually crossing paths with Peter Parker (Jake Johnson) who, due to the villainous Kingpin (Liev Schreiber) meddling with a dimension-altering weapon, has inadvertently been sent over from a parallel universe and who eventually teaches Miles how to be Spider-Man.

But it doesn’t stop there;many other diverse versions appear, from Gwen Stacy AKA Spider-Woman (Hailee Steinfeld) to Spider-Man Noir (Nicolas Cage). Sony’s dazzling animation is as fun because it takes that idea and just runs with it.

Anyone can wear the mask seems to be its mantra, conjuring the everyman wonder that drives much of comic book fandom. For all its eye-popping, modern visual aesthetics, it has a refreshingly old-fashioned spirit. The old and the new meet in the film’s beguiling combination of traditional hand-drawn animation and contemporary bells and whistles computer rendering. It’s about as close as a film has come to feeling like a comic book come to life.

Inventive direction by trio Bob Persichetti, Peter Ramsey and Rodney Rothman works in lovely harmony with the eclectic, knowing style of scriptwriter Phil Lord (The Lego Movie, Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs) to find quite a miraculous way of breathing new life into the overflowing comic book genre.

From its sharply-written dialogue to its very animation style itself, the film is beautifully self-aware of its own station within the overall comic book movie catalogue, cleverly lampooning yet dotingly celebrating the attributes that have become such a part of pop culture. And yet it feels like it puts its own fiercely original stamp on that most famous of heroes.

This is a visually stunning, innovative incarnation of the character; propulsive in its energetic action, engagingly voiced, tightly written as a heroic narrative arc, reverential yet forward-thinking in its ethos and with a real sense of heart and soul at its core. It’s a particular treat for fans and a welcoming,imaginative embrace for everyone.

8.8 out of 10