Sinister Movie Review 3 27

Sinister movie review

Sinister proves that it’s possible to take a well-worn, generic set-up and do something unexpected and worthwhile with it. By keeping a strong handle on atmosphere and scares that stand out from the haunted house crowd this is one of the strongest mainstream horrors to come along in quite a while.

The plot is nothing you haven’t seen before; a family, headed by writer Ellison (Ethan Hawke), move into a new home in a small American town. He is there to write his book on the murder of the family and disappearance of a little girl who lived in the new house, much to the chagrin of the local law enforcement. Not long after moving in he discovers a mysterious box in the attic filled with reel footage of a series of grisly murders that took place over many decades. But after watching them as part of his investigation he soon starts being plagued by a sinister figure that can be seen in the footage.

Directed by Scott Derrickson (who made the chilling The Exorcism of Emily Rose back in 2005) returns to the horror genre with not so much a bang as a creeping, skin crawling whisper with just a few bumps in the night thrown in for good measure. There are enough jump-scares to satisfy anyone who likes their horror to lean to that side of the scale but this is ultimately a film of pure atmosphere and startlingly horrific imagery.

Once Ellison puts the first reel into the projector – a repeated motif that hearkens back to analogue days where it wasn’t so easy to explain things away with Photoshop or fancy digital editing – and we witness the gruesome events within the reels it becomes an unnerving balance of being scared to see what’s on the next reel but being unable to look away. Like a lot of great horrors, Sinister invites you to bring a little of yourself into the experience.

The film is “from the producers of Paranormal Activity and Insidious,” and it sits as an effective halfway house between the two of them, with a healthy dose of the American remake of The Ring thrown in for good measure. Much like Insidious in particular, a supremely creepy horror that was unjustly bashed by many upon release, this gets by on tense atmosphere as much as it does sensory shock. And like Insidious it instills a feeling of being unsafe, as if something is always lurking in the room, playing on fears of what might be there as opposed to going for obvious gore tactics.

Predictably the plots creaks and wobbles as it gets into the inevitably heightened third act, with a few too many instances of over explanation and connecting of the dots that frankly we could have worked out on our own, thank you very much. There’s also a character that pops up here and there throughout who is basically a convenient plot device for Ellison to get some necessary information. It’s this need to lay things out in black and white that ultimately holds Sinister back from being truly great.

Having said that, judging Sinister on the level it’s aiming for it’s actually an effective piece of modern horror, standing head and shoulders among a sea of time-wasting production-line horrors. It pushes passed its genre clichés – shedding new light on found footage – to make for a genuinely creepy, unsettling experience.

[youtube id=”pgYxydrVlDk” width=”600″ height=”350″]

Previous ArticleNext Article
I'm a freelance film reviewer and blogger with over 10 years of experience writing for various different reputable online and print publications. In addition to my running, editing and writing for Thoughts On Film, I am also the film critic for The National, the newspaper that supports an independent Scotland, covering the weekly film releases, film festivals and film-related features. I have a passion for all types of cinema, and have a particular love for foreign language film, especially South Korean and Japanese cinema. Favourite films include The Big Lebowski, Pulp Fiction and 2001: A Space Odyssey.

3 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Movie Review: Home Again 0 346

This review was previously published at The National.

Despite an obviously talented leading lady in Reese Witherspoon and a family pedigree behind the camera in making this sort of rom-com flutter sweetly off the screen, Home Again struggles to finds its way out of cloying cliché and narrative contrivance.

This is the directorial debut of Hallie Myers-Shyer, daughter of genre stalwart Nancy Meyers (The Holiday, What Women Want). It focuses on the life of Alice Kinney (Witherspoon), a single mum who has just turned 40 and tries her best to raise her two daughters Isabel (Lola Flanery) and Rosie (Eden Grace Redfield) in Los Angeles with her job as an interior decorator.

Freshly separated from her British music mogul husband Austen (Michael Sheen), she embarks on a drunken birthday night celebration that leads to her meeting a trio of 20-something lads – Harry (Pico Alexander), George (Jon Rudnitsky) and Teddy (Nat Wolff) – who are trying their best to break into the Hollywood movie business.

The young men improbably end up staying in Alice’s guest house while they work on finishing the script for their first film. Before long they become an integral part of her life, from Alice embarking on a romantic relationship with Harry to George helping out Isabel with her school play. To quote the title of the director’s mother’s 2009 film – it’s complicated.

Except the film mistakes the kind of enjoyably frothy complexity exemplified by the best of the genre for skin-clawing convolution that renders much of the romantic and comedically-tinged drama of Alice’s life lacking in authenticity. Not that it needs the ring of truth that comes with, say, a Ken Loach picture but you need to be able to invest and believe in these characters’ lives as presented.

The approach to gender and generational relationships is simplistic which, of course, is nothing new to a genre that, at least in its Hollywoodized state, so often throws up films meant to be taken as easy-going fluff. But it’s particularly frustrating here when it squanders the potential thrown up with the initial concept of a woman trying to find herself again once she’s out of a stale relationship by entering into one with a much younger man.

It strangely seems far more interested in the plight of the three young men working as three cogs of one creative machine – director/producer, writer and actor – to get ahead in the movie business.  But even then it smacks of implausibility, like a cheap rom-com version of the bromance found in Entourage but without any of the snarky wit or Hollywood satire. Despite decent chemistry between a likeable assembled cast, Home Again is a tough pill to swallow as it rings false through and through.

3.5 out of 10

Movie Review: Goodbye Christopher Robin 0 370

This review was previously published at The National.

The world of celebrated children’s author A. A. Milne and the creation of his beloved Winnie the Pooh stories are chronicled in this frightfully polite biopic from director Simon Curtis (My Week with Marilyn) that flirts with dipping its toes into darker waters but steadfastly clings to safe tropes and always with its top button firmly fastened.

We start off in 1941 where we find an ageing Milne (Domhnall Gleeson in questionable make-up and greyed hair) and his wife Daphne (Margot Robbie) living on their secluded East Sussex farm. They receive a telegram informing them that their son, C.R. Milne, is missing presumed dead after heading off to fight in World War Two.

We then jump back in time to Milne on the front lines of the First World War. He returns from the fighting a changed man; suffering from PTSD (popped balloons evoking sudden gunfire et al.), becoming increasingly sick of just making people laugh with his West End plays and the general hustle-bustle that comes with big city life.

He convinces his reluctant wife to move to the country for some peace and quiet and where his infant son, Christopher Robin (played by Will Tilston at the younger age, Alex Lawther as he gets older), can go on the childhood adventures he deserves with the support of loving nanny Olive (Kelly Macdonald).

Settling into the kind of serene life he craves, he is inspired to create Winnie the Pooh and the rest of his soon-to-be-beloved friends inspired by the stuffed animals with which his young son has become so enamoured. Unfortunately for Christopher – referred to by everyone as “Billy Moon” – his father uses his real name in the stories, turning him into one of the most famous boys in the nation.

Despite the obvious attraction of it exploring the world famous Pooh stories, it’s a film much more interested in the effect it has on a fractured family clinging on to peacefulness, not least the unwanted attention thrust upon a young boy who simply isn’t equipped to handle it and how his parents carry on oblivious.

If anything it takes a curiously bleak outlook on what these stories mean to the world once they’ve been put out there, conveying a somewhat confusing message for a film that ultimately wants us to celebrate these stories as immortally cherished tales; that the Winnie the Pooh embraced immediately by the public and has now stood the test of time for almost a century is in some way missing the point of what it truly means to the author and a son who, inadvertently or not, was used as a tool of innocence to sell the idea of an idyllic childhood in Milne’s Hundred Acre Wood.

It’s bolstered by almost uniformly moving performances; Gleeson plays Milne with a kind of damaged empathy that makes you feel like you get to know the author beyond the public persona. Macdonald is oftentimes heart-breaking as Christopher’s devoted caregiver and Tilston walks away with the film as the adorably sweet-natured young Christopher. It’s only with Robbie that the film makes a misstep; she’s miscast as Milne’s wife and never stepping out of the shadow of cold motherly cliché.

In spite of its darker leanings, the film remains too buttoned up to properly wrestle with those themes in any sort of lasting way, far too polite to ever dive head first into the murky waters into which the drama intermittently peers.

Wrapped in Ben Smithard’s handsomely old-fashioned cinematography and soaked in Carter Burwell’s perpetually swelling score, it’s an aesthetically and emotionally appealing but nevertheless fairly vanilla period biopic best suited to being enjoyed on a rainy Sunday afternoon with tea and biscuits.

6.5 out of 10