Carnage Movie Review 0 794

Carnage movie review

Carnage is a film about breaking down the barriers of what you can and can’t say in social situations. What people really think is often not what they communicate to others publicly, and the film tackles that by throwing politeness out-the-window and scratching away the surface layers of civility.

Based on the award-winning play “Le Dieu du carnage” (God of Carnage) by Yasmina Reza and co-written and directed by Roman Polanski (The Pianist), Carnage centres on two couples, played by Jodie Foster and John C. Reilly and Kate Winslet and Christoph Waltz. After a fight in the park between the two couple’s respective children, they decide to meet and civilly discuss the incident like adults… or at least that’s the plan.

I must be clear in saying that I haven’t seen the play the film is based on, so I can’t judge the accuracy of the adaptation or how it compares in quality. But nevertheless it’s quite clear from the start that it’s based on a stage play because of the fact that – with the exception of short segments bookending the film – it’s set entirely in one apartment, and mostly in one room. To an extent this is contrived, particularly when every time one of the couple’s goes to leave they are forced to stay. However, when the performances and dialogue are this good it’s hard to care about the rather rigid set-up.

Since the movie isn’t eventful in terms of going from place to place, the film relies heavily on the performances. Luckily we’re in safe hands with some of the best actors working today, each of them giving brilliant performances in their own rights. Winslet is the obvious stand-out, not least because she gets some of the best dialogue and a particularly memorable scene which I won’t spoil here. However, for my money Foster was the real strongest point. She’s the one who gets the most emotional heavy-lifting to do as she tries to defend her son under a barrage of accusations and insults.

The women may steal the show but the boys put up a good (verbal) fight as well. Waltz, most famous for his Oscar-winning performance in Quentin Tarantino’s Inglourious Basterds, is the most level-headed of the four, only truly wavering once he loses his precious mobile phone he never seems to be able to put down. Lastly we have Reilly, an actor unfairly associated with his comedic antics with Will Ferrell, but who is actually a fantastic dramatic actor. He gets to shine here as the husband of Foster, fed up of being told what’s what in his own home.

Polanski has always been quite a diverse film-maker, from his early work like Rosemary’s Baby and Chinatown through to The Pianist and his last film The Ghost. However, if you didn’t know that Carnage was directed by him it would be hard to guess. It’s got less scope than we might expect from him, and not just because it doesn’t move from one location, which means it’s both more focused and less ambitious than some of his other work.

There’s an overall feeling that Carnage could have a lot more to say, and the general consensus is that the play very much does that. But as it stands the film is an often flat-out hilarious experience, featuring terrific performances, ultimately about four people in a room shouting the truth at each other for 80 minutes. And despite its obvious staginess, it works.

[youtube id=”ON3kwJPwcMU” width=”600″ height=”350″]

Previous ArticleNext Article
I'm a freelance film reviewer and blogger with over 10 years of experience writing for various different reputable online and print publications. In addition to my running, editing and writing for Thoughts On Film, I am also the film critic for The National, the newspaper that supports an independent Scotland, covering the weekly film releases, film festivals and film-related features. I have a passion for all types of cinema, and have a particular love for foreign language film, especially South Korean and Japanese cinema. Favourite films include The Big Lebowski, Pulp Fiction and 2001: A Space Odyssey.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Movie Review: Aquaman 0 1891

The rocky road of DCEU films has traversed highs and lows, from the zeitgeist-capturing Wonder Woman to the absolute mess of Justice League. It’s a Marvel-rivalling gambit that, at its worst, is morosely serious in how it goes about presenting its outlandish superhero world without the depth to back it up.

The latest instalment seems to recognise and avoid that danger by being utterly, eternally ludicrous and over-the-top. But most importantly, where it counts anyway, it’s crucially self-aware of that fact and has a fun time plunging us into the depths and carrying us to great heights of entertainingly ridiculous spectacle.

We first met Arthur Curry AKA the Aquaman (Jason Momoa) teaming up with the Justice League. But how did he come to be imbued with the powers of the ocean? The film sets up his origin story quite well as we discover in the film’s opening minutes that his mother was Atlanna (Nicole Kidman), Queen of the ancient underwater Kingdom of Atlantis, who washed up on the “surface world” and met and fell in love with lighthouse keeper Thomas (Temeura Morrison).

Together they had a child that, to her mind, bridges the divide between the underwater and surface worlds, proving they can be one. However, it’s a view not greatly shared by many of her own people; when she wilfully returns to Atlantis for the sake of her son’s survival, they carry out a swift sentence of justice that would affect her husband and son’s destiny forever.

In the present day, Aquaman is approached by Mera (Amber Heard), a warrior princess of Nereus (Dolph Lundgren), who tries to convince him that he must claim his rightful place as King of Atlantis. This is in order to thwart his ruthless and cunning half-brother Orm (Patrick Wilson) from seizing power as Ocean Master that would lead to a full-scale attack on the surface world, someone who considers Aquaman to be a “half-breed” not worthy of the throne.

Credit must go to director James Wan (a filmmaker who has gone from horror franchises like Saw, Insidious and The Conjuring to blockbusters like Fast & Furious 7) for really going for it by delivering an eye-popping, bonkers visual style that seems to make every effort to be the opposite of drab.

It’s fuelled by a marriage between the comic book page and Greek mythology; sometimes that gets the better of it in the shape of characters going on extended monologues that explain legends in the finest detail, though at others that feeds into the idea of stories retold through the ages.

The film is a treat to behold whenever it dives into the ocean as Wan embraces the absurdity at every turn (look out for the giant neon-lit octopus playing the drums), wearing the inherent goofiness as a badge of honour rather than anything to shy away from. And,perhaps most importantly, the cast seems completely on-board for having as much fun with those OTT concepts as they want the audience to have.

Momoa brings alight-hearted charisma, which carries the film whenever it leans too heavy into one-liner humour that doesn’t always land as hoped, while bringing a welcome sense of bruising physicality to the action scenes that are otherwise so reliant on CGI.

An impressive cast of more seasoned actors all lend as much weight to it as possible, from Kidman’s caring, strong-willed portrayal of Aquaman’s mother to Willem Dafoe as his Atlantean trainer Vulko and particularly Wilson, who lends formidable threat to the potentially bland villain Orm.

For a film that had the potential to get so tangled up in both its place within an overall comic book movie universe and the mythology that sets the foundation of its tale, it’s surprisingly streamlined and enjoyably accessible. It’s a refreshingly carefree,unchallenging romp that invites you to let the tidal wave of rambunctious comic book movie sensibilities wash over you.

6.5 out of 10

Movie Review: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse 0 1761

After so many sequels and reboots of the Spider-Man character on the big-screen, from Sam Raimi’s trilogy to the character being integrated into the Marvel Cinematic Universe, it’s hard to see what else they can give us that’s going to surprise. But along comes an animated Spider-Man to do just that.

Miles Morales (Shameik Moore) is a normal teenager living in New York with his parents; loving but fairly easy-going mother Rio (Luna Lauren) and loving but tough police officer father Jefferson (Brian Tyree Henry) – the film has a surprising emotional through-line in how it depicts the father-son relationship.

One day while doing some secretive spray painting with his chummy uncle Aaron (Mahershala Ali), he is bitten by a mysterious spider that gives him special powers from web slinging to a tingling Spidey Sense.

This leads him to eventually crossing paths with Peter Parker (Jake Johnson) who, due to the villainous Kingpin (Liev Schreiber) meddling with a dimension-altering weapon, has inadvertently been sent over from a parallel universe and who eventually teaches Miles how to be Spider-Man.

But it doesn’t stop there;many other diverse versions appear, from Gwen Stacy AKA Spider-Woman (Hailee Steinfeld) to Spider-Man Noir (Nicolas Cage). Sony’s dazzling animation is as fun because it takes that idea and just runs with it.

Anyone can wear the mask seems to be its mantra, conjuring the everyman wonder that drives much of comic book fandom. For all its eye-popping, modern visual aesthetics, it has a refreshingly old-fashioned spirit. The old and the new meet in the film’s beguiling combination of traditional hand-drawn animation and contemporary bells and whistles computer rendering. It’s about as close as a film has come to feeling like a comic book come to life.

Inventive direction by trio Bob Persichetti, Peter Ramsey and Rodney Rothman works in lovely harmony with the eclectic, knowing style of scriptwriter Phil Lord (The Lego Movie, Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs) to find quite a miraculous way of breathing new life into the overflowing comic book genre.

From its sharply-written dialogue to its very animation style itself, the film is beautifully self-aware of its own station within the overall comic book movie catalogue, cleverly lampooning yet dotingly celebrating the attributes that have become such a part of pop culture. And yet it feels like it puts its own fiercely original stamp on that most famous of heroes.

This is a visually stunning, innovative incarnation of the character; propulsive in its energetic action, engagingly voiced, tightly written as a heroic narrative arc, reverential yet forward-thinking in its ethos and with a real sense of heart and soul at its core. It’s a particular treat for fans and a welcoming,imaginative embrace for everyone.

8.8 out of 10